Automutiny stands for a simple idea. Software should take repetitive work off your team without taking judgment away from your people. Each agent works inside boundaries you set, with checkpoints you approve.
The name joins automation with a refusal to automate work that should stay human. That is the line we draw in every workflow: what the agent owns, what your people keep, and what the numbers support.
Every workflow has a point where more autonomy stops paying. We find it, build to it, and say no when the numbers do not support a build.
A demo proves a model can do something once. Production numbers prove a system does it every day at a cost that beats the alternative. We sign acceptance criteria, then publish how we measure.
You own what we build: source, prompts, configs, docs, evals. Running costs pass through at cost. Retainers buy monitoring, never access.
Automutiny builds Controlled Autonomy AI agents for accounting and CPA firms: AI owns the repetitive work, your team keeps the judgment, and we prove the economics in production.
Our clients are US accounting, CPA, and tax firms with 20 to 200 people: large enough that repetitive workflows have real cost, small enough that nobody has time to babysit a science project.
I built software for years and kept seeing the same problem. Firms bought more tools, but the manual work stayed. The missing piece was not another product. It was a clear decision about what the system should own and where people should stay in control. Automutiny exists to make that decision measurable, then build around it.
Connect on LinkedInThe audit takes two weeks and costs $4,500. You will know what the workflow costs now, what a calibrated version would cost, and whether it is worth building.
Book the Profitable Line Audit